diff --git a/.obsidian/workspace.json b/.obsidian/workspace.json index b8a2990..3c78deb 100644 --- a/.obsidian/workspace.json +++ b/.obsidian/workspace.json @@ -8,18 +8,18 @@ "type": "tabs", "children": [ { - "id": "7c97ae312d441f70", + "id": "8010a129ca4d60fc", "type": "leaf", "state": { "type": "markdown", "state": { - "file": "content/posts/House of Leaves Appendix II-E, The Three Attic Whalestoe Institute Letters (May 8th, 1987).md", + "file": "content/posts/Princess Bubblegum & Marceline Still Just Almost Girlfriends.md", "mode": "source", "source": false, "backlinks": false }, "icon": "lucide-file", - "title": "House of Leaves Appendix II-E, The Three Attic Whalestoe Institute Letters (May 8th, 1987)" + "title": "Princess Bubblegum & Marceline Still Just Almost Girlfriends" } } ] @@ -183,26 +183,27 @@ "obsidian-git:Open Git source control": false } }, - "active": "7c97ae312d441f70", + "active": "8010a129ca4d60fc", "lastOpenFiles": [ + "public/tags/television/index.xml", + "public/tags/television/index.html", + "public/tags/television", + "public/princess-bubblegum-marceline-still-just-almost-girlfriends/index.html", + "public/princess-bubblegum-marceline-still-just-almost-girlfriends", + "public/posts/princess-bubblegum--marceline-still-just-almost-girlfriends/index.html", + "public/posts/princess-bubblegum--marceline-still-just-almost-girlfriends", + "public/posts/untitled/index.html", + "public/posts/untitled", + "content/week-notes/029.md", + "content/posts/Princess Bubblegum & Marceline Still Just Almost Girlfriends.md", + "content/posts/House of Leaves Appendix II-E, The Three Attic Whalestoe Institute Letters (May 8th, 1987).md", "public/tags/wordpress/index.xml", "public/tags/wordpress/index.html", - "public/tags/wordpress", - "public/week-notes/029/index.html", - "public/week-notes/029", - "public/house-of-leaves-appendix-ii-e-the-three-attic-whalestoe-institute-letters-may-8th-1987/index.html", - "public/house-of-leaves-appendix-ii-e-the-three-attic-whalestoe-institute-letters-may-8th-1987", - "Content.base", - "content/week-notes/029.md", - "content/posts/House of Leaves Appendix II-E, The Three Attic Whalestoe Institute Letters (May 8th, 1987).md", "content/week-notes/028.md", "conflict-files-obsidian-git.md", "content/posts/Intentional Listening.md", "content/week-notes/027.md", "content/posts/Using Hugo to generate a podcast feed.md", - "syntax_dark.css", - "syntax_light.css", - "public/css/syntax.css", "content/posts/turning 30.md", "content/posts/2025-08-11.md", "content/posts/test.md", @@ -219,7 +220,6 @@ "content/week-notes/007.md", "content/week-notes/008.md", "content/week-notes/009.md", - "content/week-notes/010.md", - "content/week-notes/011.md" + "content/week-notes/010.md" ] } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/posts/Princess Bubblegum & Marceline Still Just Almost Girlfriends.md b/content/posts/Princess Bubblegum & Marceline Still Just Almost Girlfriends.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c80b769 --- /dev/null +++ b/content/posts/Princess Bubblegum & Marceline Still Just Almost Girlfriends.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +--- +title: "Princess Bubblegum & Marceline: Still Just Almost Girlfriends" +date: 2014-08-14 +url: princess-bubblegum-marceline-still-just-almost-girlfriends +tags: + - television + - wordpress +draft: false +cover: https://cdn.cassie.ink/images/2014/almostgfs.png +--- +It’s only natural that the first post on my shiny new blog should be about these two, isn’t it? + +Let me preface this post by saying that I love Princess Bubblegum and Marceline and Bubbline and Sugarless Gum, all of that — whatever you’d like to call it, I ship it. Hard. I may not be a long-time _Adventure Time_ fan; I have not experienced firsthand the “What Was Missing” controversy, the joy delivered when _Sky Witch_ premiered, and so on. I jumped on-board late, binge-watched my way to this pairing, which washed over me with all its fluffy, tumultuous grace. I was vaguely aware that it was a popular ship as I made my way up to “What Was Missing”; I transcended as I witnessed Marceline’s impromptu, angst-ridden love ballad to Peebles; I immediately rewatched “Go With Me”, eager to see the pair’s first on-screen interaction; I stormed ahead to “Sky Witch”. I filled my tumblr with all the lovely fanart in existence for the couple, bemusing my followers who already taunted me for my FemShep/Liara obsession; I formed headcanons, all of it. + +In that same vein, I would love to see the two become canon — not _just_ because I ship them as I do, but because representing bi or pan[^1] people[^2] and relationships on television — _children’s_ television, no less! — is top priority here. + +That being established, I think we need to rewind a little bit and go through the history (which, if you’re reading this post, probably isn’t any kind of news… but bear with me). + +Following the première of [“What Was Missing”](http://adventuretime.wikia.com/wiki/What_Was_Missing "Episode synopsis") — essentially, Bubbline gospel — a promotional video series titled _Mathematical!_ posted a recap of the episode, as they were wont to do. In it, they commented on the “possible subtext” within the episode, using [some of Natasha Allegri’s more suggestive art](https://natazilla.tumblr.com/tagged/adventure+time). The video was pulled, _Mathematical!_ was discontinued, and [Dan Rickmers lost his job](https://web.archive.org/web/20160413073842/http://danrickmers.com/post/10906625743/just-so-you-know-the-adventure-time-fandom-is). Since, “Sky Witch” and the _Adventure Time_ comics have tantalized fans waiting for the ship to become canon, but not much more. Oh, and Marceline made good on her promise to drink the red from Bubblegum’s “pretty pink face” in _Red Starved_. + +Back into the (almost) present, Olivia Olson — the voice actress for Marceline — appeared at a Barnes & Noble panel, where a fan asked her about the relationship between PB and the Vampire Queen… + +> [Pendleton Ward] said “Oh, you know they dated right?” And I said “That’s what I figured from all the creepy fanart… are they going to do it on the show? Or can we say anything about it in the book?” and he’s like “I don’t know about the book but in some countries where the show airs that sort of thing is illegal,” so that’s why they’re not putting it in the show. So who knows, maybe there will be something about it in the new episodes that we’re not supposed to talk about… + +[See the video here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EleCNWfwTY), which, as you might have guessed, was shared almost instantly. A day later, Olivia Olson tweeted: + +> I like to make things up at panels. Ya’ll [sic] take my stories way too seriously… + +The tweet was subsequently deleted, but [is preserved by the TweetPoster bot on reddit](http://www.reddit.com/r/adventuretime/comments/2d0ees/olivia_olson_addresses_the_reveal_at_the_book/cjktg8z). Sounds a lot like damage control, to me — if I had to guess, Olson was relaying genuine information, realized the video had blown up, attempted to cover up her tracks — albeit gracelessly — and then deleted the tweet for some reason (likely _because_ it was so sloppy). + +Six days later, [Buzzfeed picked up the news](http://www.buzzfeed.com/skarlan/adventure-time-actor-confirms-princess-bubblegum-and-marceli), and [HuffPo not long after that](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/15/adventure-time-rumor_n_5681894.html), both assuring readers that the couple was confirmed. + +And don’t get me wrong — I’m thrilled. Absolutely jazzed, not just because this has given the Bubbline tag new life on tumblr (even if it’s just excited gifs from even more excited fans, which is precious in its own right). But we haven’t reached canon _yet_. Of course, the very definition of canon is complex. One needs only scratch the surface of the multiple levels of canon within the _Star Wars_ universe to understand just how complicated it can be, but _absolute_ canon strictly adheres to only the source material — that is, the _Adventure Time_show — and official, “word of God” statements (which a paraphrased account from a voice actress is not). + +> Yo people need to quit saying that Bubbeline is canon because the Marceline voice actress said so. Unless it’s on the show it’s not canon! +> It’s cute and sweet and she’s a delight but it isn’t canon +> I wish! +> They won’t let me put it in the books + +—[Kate Leth on Twitter](https://adventuretitan.tumblr.com/post/94857816987/this-is-kate-leths-response) + +I’m not harboring any delusions of Prubs and Marceline making out on-screen, of course — I acknowledge that this is a children’s show, though light kissing has become commonplace since Finn’s relationship with Flame Princess, and mature subject matter isn’t exactly excluded either. Until we have that in-show confirmation, though, I’m dubious about dubbing the two “canon.” I can’t blame those who do, though — with the extremely limited representation of queer romances in the media, and the few _being_ shown often being problematic, fans have to take what they can get. It’s a time to celebrate, certainly. But we’re not out of the closet yet — and that’s not just my preferences on what is and isn’t canon speaking. + +Given all the wonderful, beautiful qualities and nuances of the show, I have faith in them to do it. _Adventure Time_ is one of the most popular children’s shows out there today because it doesn’t underestimate its audience; it doesn’t shy away from subject matter because it might be controversial or uncomfortable, even if often done allegorically (I’m looking at you, “Lemonhope”). I want the _Adventure Time_ crew, and Cartoon Network by extension, to have the bravery to stick their necks out and stand up for the cause of representation.  To have such a popular show openly come forward with two of its major characters in a bi/pan relationship would be earth-shattering. Little steps are great, but we should not satisfy ourselves with less than what the show is capable of and what fans — and children, and queer people, — _deserve_. + +[^1]: It’s unclear which. Many people — including myself, in the past — have labelled the two and/or the relationship as lesbian, incorrectly as both have dated or otherwise been romantically involved with men (Marceline with Ash, PB with Mr. Creampuff, Braco, and Finn, the latter two arguable). Furthermore, I think it would be most important to allow the characters — and therefore, the creators, — to choose whichever term they sexually identify with, if any. But I digress, and find bi or pan most accurate. + +[^2]: Also they’re not _exactly_ people. One is made out of candy and the other is a demon/human/vampire hybrid. diff --git a/content/week-notes/029.md b/content/week-notes/029.md index 24f2298..eaddd01 100644 --- a/content/week-notes/029.md +++ b/content/week-notes/029.md @@ -6,6 +6,9 @@ tags: draft: true --- ## Doing +I'm backporting a bunch of content from my old blogs so I can finally stop maintaining WordPress blogs. Here are the posts that I've moved over: +* [House of Leaves: Appendix II-E, The Three Attic Whalestoe Institute Letters (May 8th, 1987)](https://cassie.ink/house-of-leaves-appendix-ii-e-the-three-attic-whalestoe-institute-letters-may-8th-1987/) (2015-01-01) +Sorry for unintentional pings on RSS aggregators; also, be aware that a lot of these are vey old (like, almost ten years) and don't necessarily reflect who I am as a person today! I'm trying to be better about preserving and sharing my writing, so I suppose that means I must submit to [the mortifying ordeal of being known](https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/15/i-know-what-you-think-of-me/). ## Reading diff --git a/public/emily-dickinson-queer-theory/index.html b/public/emily-dickinson-queer-theory/index.html index a7759d0..a7e741d 100644 --- a/public/emily-dickinson-queer-theory/index.html +++ b/public/emily-dickinson-queer-theory/index.html @@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ emily-dickinson-queer-theory -
-
+

The lives of many literary greats remain a relative mystery; literary critics and historians are often left to piece together details from letters, documentation, and, sometimes controversially, the author’s work read for repeated motifs. They then draw what conclusions they can about the authors’ lives. One of the most prolific female poets in the English literary canon, Emily Dickinson’s life is preserved in letters and artifacts from her life. When examined as a body of work, Dickinson’s poetry reveals a pattern of focus on women’s interior lives and relationships that may be regarded as queer, especially with the added dimension of her close relationship with her sister-in-law. This essay examines a selection of her poems through a queer lens, highlighting the poems’ relationships to female love and Dickinson’s life and arguing against established patterns of erasing Dickinson’s queer identity.

Critical representation of Dickinson paints her an immensely private, reclusive individual. Known in her Massachusetts home of Amherst as “the Myth,” Dickinson “lived a nun-like existence, wearing only white, seeing no one but her sister, writing poems that almost no one saw” (Nicholson). This suggests that the aforementioned canonical portrait of Dickinson is mostly accurate, but though she saw few in person, she had a rich inner existence, expressed in her many poems and letters. Indeed, both her poems and letters were directed to her “most trusted literary audience,” Sue Dickinson (née Gilbert) (Nell Smith 56). Dickinson shared “about 250 poems” with Gilbert, “by far the largest number” compared to Dickinson’s other family members and acquaintances (Franklin 3). While the particulars of their relationship are lost to time, Dickinson and Gilbert unarguably shared an intimate connection; many of Dickinson’s poems are directed, either explicitly or implicitly, to Gilbert. Despite this, “until recently most literary critics have refused to acknowledge her love for other women,” instead continuing to prop up the image of the maidenly recluse (Faderman 43). Twentieth century critics, acknowledging the romantic and erotic contents of Dickinson’s poems, embarked on a “quest for the identity of this ‘reclusive spinster’s’ elusive (male) love,” though evidence shows “no significant heterosexual involvements until [Dickinson] was well into middle age” (Faderman 43). More recent literary criticism examines Dickinson’s poetry through a queer lens, but there is a long history of criticism going to “great lengths to explain away the content of same-sex love in her poems” (Faderman 45).

diff --git a/public/hugo-podcast/index.html b/public/hugo-podcast/index.html index d5199c1..e9ad43a 100644 --- a/public/hugo-podcast/index.html +++ b/public/hugo-podcast/index.html @@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ hugo-podcast -
-
+

I’ve been podcasting on and off for over ten years now — all shows that I’ve since abandoned1, either intentionally or due to time — but I’ve kept websites for them up and running for archival purposes. Originally, the sites were powered by WordPress and podcasting plugins (PowerPress and then Podlove). I didn’t want to continue paying to host the sites nor maintain a WordPress install2. I could, of course, use one of the many podcast hosting services out there — but just like I believe in owning your own space on the internet, I believe you should own and control your podcast feed (and not have to pay a company $15/mo in perpetuity). I use Hugo (which I then deploy with Cloudflare Pages) to generate the sites and feeds; I chose Hugo because I understand how to use it. I’m sure you could make this work with other static site generators. There’s an 11ty plugin out there, for example, which is far more advanced than what I’ve set up. But I built this myself. It works. It does not require me to endlessly fiddle or update (unless I want to).

I am not going to cover hosting your audio files in this post. I offload mine to a storage zone on Bunny; my podcasts are low traffic, so that costs me $12/yr. You could probably get away with using archive.org for free instead, as long as you can get a direct link to your mp3. I’m also not going to cover creating a theme for your podcast in this post. I made my own for both of my sites, but you can easily use a premade one.

diff --git a/public/index.html b/public/index.html index b48de03..69aa95d 100644 --- a/public/index.html +++ b/public/index.html @@ -60,12 +60,15 @@

Doing

+

I’m backporting a bunch of content from my old blogs so I can finally stop maintaining WordPress blogs. Here are the posts that I’ve moved over:

+

Reading

Watching

Playing

I’m still playing Fields of Mistria, although I have had a few mid-day game crashes this week. The game is in early access, so I can’t complain too much, but it’s the first time it’s happened to me. It’s frustrating to lose progress, but I suppose I should get into the habit of saving a few times throughout the day.1

-

Listening

-

I listened to SUCK UP ALL THE OXYGEN by Hutch Harris because I saw the cover on Bandcamp and thought it was funny. The album was fine but not for me. There was a time in my life when I probably would have been really into this, but it’s not now.

diff --git a/public/index.xml b/public/index.xml index ff4dbd1..95e142b 100644 --- a/public/index.xml +++ b/public/index.xml @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ http://localhost:1313/week-notes/029/ Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0000 http://localhost:1313/week-notes/029/ - <h2 id="doing">Doing</h2> <h2 id="reading">Reading</h2> <h2 id="watching">Watching</h2> <h2 id="playing">Playing</h2> <p>I&rsquo;m still playing <em>Fields of Mistria</em>, although I have had a few mid-day game crashes this week. The game is in early access, so I can&rsquo;t complain too much, but it&rsquo;s the first time it&rsquo;s happened to me. It&rsquo;s frustrating to lose progress, but I suppose I should get into the habit of saving a few times throughout the day.<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup></p> <h2 id="listening">Listening</h2> <p>I listened to <a href="hutchharris.bandcamp.com/album/suck-up-all-the-oxygen"><em>SUCK UP ALL THE OXYGEN</em> by Hutch Harris</a> because I saw the cover on Bandcamp and thought it was funny. The album was fine but not for me. There was a time in my life when I probably would have been really into this, but it&rsquo;s not now.</p> <p>I picked up my <em>All We Know is Falling</em> listen from last week, too. 6. Never Let This Go - a nice build and pleasant to listen to, but it blends in with a lot of the rest of the album (yet fails to stand out). 7. Whoa - I always loved this one; great energy that lets me overlook the silly lyrics. 8. Conspiracy - forgettable 9. Franklin - I was so surprised by how fond of this song I still am. It&rsquo;s sweet; the backing vocals are a bit distracting — I&rsquo;d rather they were just Hayley, but I understand that they were going for a duet. 10. My Heart - I was listening to a decent rip of this album but this song still somehow sounds like a super compressed 96kbps MP3. The screaming in this song is also so atonal — it feels like a studio note given what was &ldquo;in&rdquo; at the time. 11. Oh Star - another forgettable one for me; I don&rsquo;t really like slow songs in general I think and especially not when Paramore does them.</p> <p>I went back to <em>fishmonger</em> by underscores. I really love this album (still). I love just about every song on it, but &ldquo;Del mar county fair (2008)&rdquo; is hitting for me in particular lately.</p> <div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes"> <hr> <ol> <li id="fn:1"> <p><em>Mistria</em> gives you this option; <em>Stardew</em> does not&hellip; but I&rsquo;ve never had a mid-day crash in <em>Stardew.</em>&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p> </li> </ol> </div> + <h2 id="doing">Doing</h2> <p>I&rsquo;m backporting a bunch of content from my old blogs so I can finally stop maintaining WordPress blogs. Here are the posts that I&rsquo;ve moved over:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://cassie.ink/house-of-leaves-appendix-ii-e-the-three-attic-whalestoe-institute-letters-may-8th-1987/">House of Leaves: Appendix II-E, The Three Attic Whalestoe Institute Letters (May 8th, 1987)</a> (2015-01-01) Sorry for unintentional pings on RSS aggregators; also, be aware that a lot of these are vey old (like, almost ten years) and don&rsquo;t necessarily reflect who I am as a person today! I&rsquo;m trying to be better about preserving and sharing my writing, so I suppose that means I must submit to <a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/15/i-know-what-you-think-of-me/">the mortifying ordeal of being known</a>.</li> </ul> <h2 id="reading">Reading</h2> <h2 id="watching">Watching</h2> <h2 id="playing">Playing</h2> <p>I&rsquo;m still playing <em>Fields of Mistria</em>, although I have had a few mid-day game crashes this week. The game is in early access, so I can&rsquo;t complain too much, but it&rsquo;s the first time it&rsquo;s happened to me. It&rsquo;s frustrating to lose progress, but I suppose I should get into the habit of saving a few times throughout the day.<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup></p> <h2 id="listening">Listening</h2> <p>I listened to <a href="hutchharris.bandcamp.com/album/suck-up-all-the-oxygen"><em>SUCK UP ALL THE OXYGEN</em> by Hutch Harris</a> because I saw the cover on Bandcamp and thought it was funny. The album was fine but not for me. There was a time in my life when I probably would have been really into this, but it&rsquo;s not now.</p> <p>I picked up my <em>All We Know is Falling</em> listen from last week, too. 6. Never Let This Go - a nice build and pleasant to listen to, but it blends in with a lot of the rest of the album (yet fails to stand out). 7. Whoa - I always loved this one; great energy that lets me overlook the silly lyrics. 8. Conspiracy - forgettable 9. Franklin - I was so surprised by how fond of this song I still am. It&rsquo;s sweet; the backing vocals are a bit distracting — I&rsquo;d rather they were just Hayley, but I understand that they were going for a duet. 10. My Heart - I was listening to a decent rip of this album but this song still somehow sounds like a super compressed 96kbps MP3. The screaming in this song is also so atonal — it feels like a studio note given what was &ldquo;in&rdquo; at the time. 11. Oh Star - another forgettable one for me; I don&rsquo;t really like slow songs in general I think and especially not when Paramore does them.</p> <p>I went back to <em>fishmonger</em> by underscores. I really love this album (still). I love just about every song on it, but &ldquo;Del mar county fair (2008)&rdquo; is hitting for me in particular lately.</p> <div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes"> <hr> <ol> <li id="fn:1"> <p><em>Mistria</em> gives you this option; <em>Stardew</em> does not&hellip; but I&rsquo;ve never had a mid-day crash in <em>Stardew.</em>&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p> </li> </ol> </div> Reduced to tongue eardrum thumb pencil and price (WN28) @@ -442,6 +442,13 @@ http://localhost:1313/house-of-leaves-appendix-ii-e-the-three-attic-whalestoe-institute-letters-may-8th-1987/ <p>I’ve picked up <em>House of Leaves</em> again, Mark Z. Danielewski’s debut novel and veritable puzzle of a book. I previously abandoned it because, as a horror novel, I was having some trouble sleeping after reading it, but I’ve wanted to read it for years and the new year seems like a good time to conquer my fears.</p> <p>There’s plenty of discussion around the internet regarding the book, and plenty more people who, I’m sure, have decoded the book’s many coded messages. But I’m a stingy sort who likes to do things on my own, and I thought I’d log some of it here! The first of my challenges was a letter from Appendix II-E, sent to Johnny Truant from his mother; she suspects that the director of the Whalestoe Institute, where she is institutionalized, is intercepting her letters. She is able to send a private letter to Johnny via an attendant, telling him the key to her next letter: take only the first letter of each word, separate those letters into something coherent, and find her true message (the letter itself is pure nonsense). Therefore, it’s no significant discovery on my part, but more of a fun first challenge. Warning that this is a book of psychological horror, and the contents below may be troubling or triggering (esp. for rape victims).</p> <p>I won’t bother re-typing the entirety of the letter because, as I said, it’s nonsensical. However, when the first letter of each word is taken, I’ve come up with the following message.</p> <blockquote> <p>May 8th, 1987</p> <p>Dearest Johnny,</p> <p>They have found a way to break me. Rape a fifty-six year old bag of bones. There is no worse and don’t believe otherwise.</p> <p>The attendants do it. Others do it. Not every day, not every week, maybe not even every month. But they do it. Someone I don’t know always comes. When it’s dark. Late. I’ve learned not to scream, screaming gave me hope and unanswered hope is shattered hope. Think of your Haitian. It is far saner to choose rape than shattered hope. So I submit and I drift.</p> <p>I let caprice and a certain degree of free association take me away. Sometimes I’m still away long after it’s done, after he’s gone — the stranger, the attendant, the custodian, the janitor, cleaning man, waiting man, dirty man — the night tidying up after him.</p> <p>I’m in hell giving into heaven where I sometimes think of your beautiful father with his dreamy wings and only then do I allow myself to cry. Not because your mother was raped (again) but because she loved so much what she could never have been allowed to keep. Such a silly girl.</p> <p>You must save me Johnny. In the name of your father. I must escape this place or I will die.</p> <p>I love you so much.</p> <p>You are all I have.</p> <p>P.</p></blockquote> <p>In addition, throughout the letter, letters are capitalized in the middle of words (ex. ‘froWned’). When those letters are collected, it spells the following message.</p> <blockquote> <p>A face in a cloud no trace in the crowd</p></blockquote> <p>(This omits the MAN from “Man and Nam,” which have appeared between the o and w of ‘crowd.’ I have found no solution to their capitalization — yet?)</p> <p>The phrase felt familiar once I found it, so I googled it, despite my resolve to figure out the puzzles myself (if possible) — I received only results for House of Leaves — perhaps I read it on tumblr somewhere? — but Google confirmed my suspicion that the Whalestoe Letters contain plenty more secrets to uncover (I’ve not read past the May 8th letter yet). I look forward to unfolding them!</p> <h2 id="comments">Comments<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup></h2> <p><strong>Jennifer (2020-10-10):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>THANK YOU for this.</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Paul (2020-11-14):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>5 years later and I say thank you.</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Control (2021-07-26):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>Appreciate the work, thank you</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Shelby West (2021-08-02):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>6 years later! Thanks, I got stuck on the word “Haitian.”</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Tildy (2022-03-27):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>Trying to decipher by bookd light at 3am was no good thank you from 2022</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Hallway Explorer (2022-08-17):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>Yes, thank you very much.</p></blockquote> <p><strong>C (2023-05-24):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>I’m dyslexic and trying SO hard to read this book, thank you, so much this was so hard for me and you saved me so much struggle!!</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Laura5757 (2023-11-29):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>While it’s not the same, the hidden message reminds me a lot of Ezra Pound’s famous poem, “In a Station of the Metro,” which consists of only two lines: “The apparition of these faces in the crowd: / Petals on a wet, black bough.” Perhaps that is what seemed familiar to you too?</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Cassie (2024-07-02):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>Perhaps! I do teach that poem to my students, so it occupies space in my brain…</p></blockquote> <p><strong>Xynael (2024-08-07):</strong></p> <blockquote> <p>I also thought if its a key for a decipher code</p> <p>Since FACE RACE</p> <p>CLOUD CROWD</p> <p>and MAN NAM</p> <p>do this I’ve ready this in another Horror Books where they used these Einstein Codes to find hidden massages</p> <p>But I am really bad at these</p> <p>Maybe it’s nonesense and I see ghosts but maybe theres Something about it</p></blockquote> <div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes"> <hr> <ol> <li id="fn:1"> <p>This post originally appeared when I ran my site on WordPress and allowed folks to comment. Most of these are just thank yous, but I wanted to preserve them all the same.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p> </li> </ol> </div> + + Princess Bubblegum & Marceline: Still Just Almost Girlfriends + http://localhost:1313/princess-bubblegum-marceline-still-just-almost-girlfriends/ + Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0000 + http://localhost:1313/princess-bubblegum-marceline-still-just-almost-girlfriends/ + <p>It’s only natural that the first post on my shiny new blog should be about these two, isn’t it?</p> <p>Let me preface this post by saying that I love Princess Bubblegum and Marceline and Bubbline and Sugarless Gum, all of that — whatever you’d like to call it, I ship it. Hard. I may not be a long-time <em>Adventure Time</em> fan; I have not experienced firsthand the “What Was Missing” controversy, the joy delivered when <em>Sky Witch</em> premiered, and so on. I jumped on-board late, binge-watched my way to this pairing, which washed over me with all its fluffy, tumultuous grace. I was vaguely aware that it was a popular ship as I made my way up to “What Was Missing”; I transcended as I witnessed Marceline’s impromptu, angst-ridden love ballad to Peebles; I immediately rewatched “Go With Me”, eager to see the pair’s first on-screen interaction; I stormed ahead to “Sky Witch”. I filled my tumblr with all the lovely fanart in existence for the couple, bemusing my followers who already taunted me for my FemShep/Liara obsession; I formed headcanons, all of it.</p> <p>In that same vein, I would love to see the two become canon — not <em>just</em> because I ship them as I do, but because representing bi or pan<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1</a></sup> people<sup id="fnref:2"><a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">2</a></sup> and relationships on television — <em>children’s</em> television, no less! — is top priority here.</p> <p>That being established, I think we need to rewind a little bit and go through the history (which, if you’re reading this post, probably isn’t any kind of news… but bear with me).</p> <p>Following the première of <a href="http://adventuretime.wikia.com/wiki/What_Was_Missing" title="Episode synopsis">“What Was Missing”</a> — essentially, Bubbline gospel — a promotional video series titled <em>Mathematical!</em> posted a recap of the episode, as they were wont to do. In it, they commented on the “possible subtext” within the episode, using <a href="https://natazilla.tumblr.com/tagged/adventure+time">some of Natasha Allegri’s more suggestive art</a>. The video was pulled, <em>Mathematical!</em> was discontinued, and <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160413073842/http://danrickmers.com/post/10906625743/just-so-you-know-the-adventure-time-fandom-is">Dan Rickmers lost his job</a>. Since, “Sky Witch” and the <em>Adventure Time</em> comics have tantalized fans waiting for the ship to become canon, but not much more. Oh, and Marceline made good on her promise to drink the red from Bubblegum’s “pretty pink face” in <em>Red Starved</em>.</p> <p>Back into the (almost) present, Olivia Olson — the voice actress for Marceline — appeared at a Barnes &amp; Noble panel, where a fan asked her about the relationship between PB and the Vampire Queen…</p> <blockquote> <p>[Pendleton Ward] said “Oh, you know they dated right?” And I said “That’s what I figured from all the creepy fanart… are they going to do it on the show? Or can we say anything about it in the book?” and he’s like “I don’t know about the book but in some countries where the show airs that sort of thing is illegal,” so that’s why they’re not putting it in the show. So who knows, maybe there will be something about it in the new episodes that we’re not supposed to talk about…</p></blockquote> <p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EleCNWfwTY">See the video here</a>, which, as you might have guessed, was shared almost instantly. A day later, Olivia Olson tweeted:</p> <blockquote> <p>I like to make things up at panels. Ya’ll [sic] take my stories way too seriously…</p></blockquote> <p>The tweet was subsequently deleted, but <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/adventuretime/comments/2d0ees/olivia_olson_addresses_the_reveal_at_the_book/cjktg8z">is preserved by the TweetPoster bot on reddit</a>. Sounds a lot like damage control, to me — if I had to guess, Olson was relaying genuine information, realized the video had blown up, attempted to cover up her tracks — albeit gracelessly — and then deleted the tweet for some reason (likely <em>because</em> it was so sloppy).</p> <p>Six days later, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/skarlan/adventure-time-actor-confirms-princess-bubblegum-and-marceli">Buzzfeed picked up the news</a>, and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/15/adventure-time-rumor_n_5681894.html">HuffPo not long after that</a>, both assuring readers that the couple was confirmed.</p> <p>And don’t get me wrong — I’m thrilled. Absolutely jazzed, not just because this has given the Bubbline tag new life on tumblr (even if it’s just excited gifs from even more excited fans, which is precious in its own right). But we haven’t reached canon <em>yet</em>. Of course, the very definition of canon is complex. One needs only scratch the surface of the multiple levels of canon within the <em>Star Wars</em> universe to understand just how complicated it can be, but <em>absolute</em> canon strictly adheres to only the source material — that is, the _Adventure Time_show — and official, “word of God” statements (which a paraphrased account from a voice actress is not).</p> <blockquote> <p>Yo people need to quit saying that Bubbeline is canon because the Marceline voice actress said so. Unless it’s on the show it’s not canon!<br> It’s cute and sweet and she’s a delight but it isn’t canon<br> I wish!<br> They won’t let me put it in the books</p></blockquote> <p>—<a href="https://adventuretitan.tumblr.com/post/94857816987/this-is-kate-leths-response">Kate Leth on Twitter</a></p> <p>I’m not harboring any delusions of Prubs and Marceline making out on-screen, of course — I acknowledge that this is a children’s show, though light kissing has become commonplace since Finn’s relationship with Flame Princess, and mature subject matter isn’t exactly excluded either. Until we have that in-show confirmation, though, I’m dubious about dubbing the two “canon.” I can’t blame those who do, though — with the extremely limited representation of queer romances in the media, and the few <em>being</em> shown often being problematic, fans have to take what they can get. It’s a time to celebrate, certainly. But we’re not out of the closet yet — and that’s not just my preferences on what is and isn’t canon speaking.</p> <p>Given all the wonderful, beautiful qualities and nuances of the show, I have faith in them to do it. <em>Adventure Time</em> is one of the most popular children’s shows out there today because it doesn’t underestimate its audience; it doesn’t shy away from subject matter because it might be controversial or uncomfortable, even if often done allegorically (I’m looking at you, “Lemonhope”). I want the <em>Adventure Time</em> crew, and Cartoon Network by extension, to have the bravery to stick their necks out and stand up for the cause of representation.  To have such a popular show openly come forward with two of its major characters in a bi/pan relationship would be earth-shattering. Little steps are great, but we should not satisfy ourselves with less than what the show is capable of and what fans — and children, and queer people, — <em>deserve</em>.</p> <div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes"> <hr> <ol> <li id="fn:1"> <p>It’s unclear which. Many people — including myself, in the past — have labelled the two and/or the relationship as lesbian, incorrectly as both have dated or otherwise been romantically involved with men (Marceline with Ash, PB with Mr. Creampuff, Braco, and Finn, the latter two arguable). Furthermore, I think it would be most important to allow the characters — and therefore, the creators, — to choose whichever term they sexually identify with, if any. But I digress, and find bi or pan most accurate.&#160;<a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p> </li> <li id="fn:2"> <p>Also they’re not <em>exactly</em> people. One is made out of candy and the other is a demon/human/vampire hybrid.&#160;<a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink">&#x21a9;&#xfe0e;</a></p> </li> </ol> </div> + about http://localhost:1313/about/ diff --git a/public/intentional-listening/index.html b/public/intentional-listening/index.html index 5d9fda5..d2f18a9 100644 --- a/public/intentional-listening/index.html +++ b/public/intentional-listening/index.html @@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ intentional-listening
-
-
+

A friend of mine is a big fan of Florence + the Machine. I confessed to only really knowing (but liking) her hits, “Dog Days” and “Cosmic Love.” I asked which album she would recommend I listen to; she said How Big, How Blue, How Beautiful (2015),1 and I texted her about some of the songs on it. She asked if I was listening to the whole thing given the back to back messages; I said yes, and I started to consider how I like to consume music.

We live in a shuffled playlist and artist mix culture.2 We collect our favorite tracks or let an algorithm serve us up suggestions of “you might like” or “this label paid for this to be fed to the masses.” I do it, too; much of my music listening is done passively, as a backdrop to other tasks that aren’t consuming my entire mental energy like driving or cleaning or unpacking (i.e. non-diegetic video game style background noise meant to go mostly unnoticed).

diff --git a/public/litr-250-close-reading-2e/index.html b/public/litr-250-close-reading-2e/index.html index a133eb8..2ce876a 100644 --- a/public/litr-250-close-reading-2e/index.html +++ b/public/litr-250-close-reading-2e/index.html @@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ litr-250-close-reading-2e -
-
+

In the beginning of Chapter VIII in the third section of To the Lighthouse, pages 186-187, Virginia Woolf’s unique approach to perspective and introspection create a subjective presentation of reality and relationships, supported by extended metaphors of fluidity and stillness. On a boat trip mandated by Mr. Ramsay to the titular lighthouse, Cam and James anatomize and unfold their feelings towards their father. Cam evolves as the boat moves across the sea while James’s unflinching rage and violence towards the patriarch repeat in this section as the sailboat halts and space contracts to exacerbate his indignation. Woolf thus frames and explores the figure of Mr. Ramsay and the nominal motif of a journey through individual introspection and excurses. 1

The selection picks up directly from the end of Chapter IV, shifting away from an interlude wherein Lily Briscoe works on her painting and contemplates her own relationships to both Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay, the former present in the scene with Cam and James, the latter casting a long shadow over it – James’s hatred of Mr. Ramsay was first introduced in an Oedipal fashion in the novel’s very first chapter, where James sees Mr. Ramsay as basking in “the pleasure of disillusioning his son… [and] ridicul[ing] his wife,” and James perceives his mother as “ten times better in every way than” her husband (Woolf 8). Woolf seemingly disregards flow and a coherent progression of events by bisecting the boat journey with Lily’s artistic journey; her prose instead acts more as combined snapshots from various perspectives about fraught, inscrutable figures like Mr. and Mrs. Ramsay. The boat trip is merely a device through which Woolf can open “the picture into the depths of consciousness,” i.e. James and Cam’s internal reflections about their father (Auerbach 540).

diff --git a/public/media-log-2024-01/index.html b/public/media-log-2024-01/index.html index c0506f2..fee9df0 100644 --- a/public/media-log-2024-01/index.html +++ b/public/media-log-2024-01/index.html @@ -57,8 +57,7 @@ media-log-2024-01 -
-
+

TV