38 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
*Source: [Manuscript critiques aren't as hard as you think | Patreon](https://www.patreon.com/posts/manuscript-arent-11552026)*
|
|
#### Think of it like a clinical trial
|
|
The writer has a perfect story in their head and needs to test the manuscript, which is the delivery mechanism for hacking the reader's brain.
|
|
|
|
#### 3 categories of critique
|
|
- **Symptom** = This is my reaction
|
|
- **Diagnosis** = This is why.
|
|
- **Prescription** = This is how to fix it.
|
|
|
|
#### Symptoms are:
|
|
Symptoms include: Awesome, bored, confused, disbelief.
|
|
(Stream of consciousness reactions are also fair, like "Don't go down there!")
|
|
|
|
#### As a reader, don't:
|
|
- Offer a diagnosis without being asked.
|
|
- Offer prescriptions without being asked.
|
|
- Edit their prose without being asked.
|
|
In all three cases, you're likely telling the story you wish you had written, instead of helping them redefine the story they want to tell.
|
|
|
|
## Reacting to critiques
|
|
#### Pay attention to your reactions
|
|
- **d'OH!** - You immediately see the problem.
|
|
- **I see what you mean, but...** - They've misdiagnosed the problem, but there is something to fix.
|
|
- **No** - They want you to write a different story.
|
|
- **WTF?** - You don't understand how they got there. Ask for a diagnosis.
|
|
|
|
#### Decoding reader symptoms
|
|
|
|
- **Awesome** - Don't fix this.
|
|
- **Bored** - A pacing issue. Fix by tightening, adding stuff to make the reader understand why it's important, or both.
|
|
- **Confused** - Order of information problem.
|
|
- **Disbelief** - You've violated their sense of how the world works.
|
|
|
|
#### As a writer, don't:
|
|
- **Apologize** - It's a clinical trial.
|
|
- **Explain** - They can't give you a clean reaction if you do.
|
|
- **Argue** - Their symptoms are true.
|
|
In all three cases, remember that the manuscript has to stand alone when it's out of trials. |